Cases

In a landmark case involving cross-border financial fraud, we successfully represented a multinational corporation seeking to recover $15 million in misappropriated funds. The assets had been funneled through a complex network of shell companies across three different jurisdictions. Our team coordinated with local counsel in Switzerland and Cyprus to obtain freezing orders and pierce the corporate veil. Through relentless litigation and strategic negotiation, we secured the full return of the principal amount and the lifting of preliminary injunctions that had paralyzed the client’s foreign operations. This case set a new precedent for international cooperation in asset tracing within the region.

We provided defense for a high-ranking tech executive accused of large-scale tax evasion and money laundering. The prosecution’s case relied heavily on misinterpreted stock option transfers and foreign income declarations. Our defense strategy involved a meticulous reconstruction of five years of financial history and the engagement of top-tier forensic auditors. We demonstrated that the alleged discrepancies were legally compliant tax optimization strategies rather than evasion. Consequently, the case was dismissed at the pre-trial investigation stage due to lack of evidence, preserving the client’s liberty and professional reputation.

Our firm was retained by a major manufacturing plant facing an aggressive hostile takeover attempt disguised as a debt restructuring process. The aggressors utilized illicit tactics, including forged documents and corrupted registrars, to seize control of the board. We immediately implemented a ‘poison pill’ defense strategy and filed emergency motions to block the illegal transfer of shares. Simultaneously, we initiated criminal proceedings against the raiders for document forgery. Our rapid intervention allowed the client to retain full control of the enterprise, and the hostile party ultimately withdrew all claims and negotiated a settlement on our terms.

We represented a leading construction consortium in a dispute over a government infrastructure contract valued at over $50 million. The state agency had wrongfully terminated the contract and refused payment for completed work, citing alleged delays. We initiated arbitration proceedings, presenting comprehensive technical evidence proving that the delays were caused by the agency’s own failure to provide site access. The arbitration tribunal ruled in our favor, awarding the client $4.2 million in damages, unpaid fees, and legal costs, fully validating our legal position and contractual interpretation.